Art and Worship
A question to my last post was of a nature that I decided to make this separate post to answer it.
Here is the question: Great thoughts on a taken-for-granted subject. I was helped in this area by Francis Shaeffer’s, “How Should We Then Live?” In this post you said, “We have abandoned the entire field to personal preference. We give ourselves over to whatever tickles our emotions and immediate passions.” I agree. But here’s a loaded question. Don’t know if you’ll take the bait. Do you think the same could be said for the use and practice of the arts in the church? How do we evaluate our worship to keep it out of the shallows?
Answer:
Thanks for the Question. I feel like the hound dog in the old Buggs Bunny cartoons being handed an old fashioned phone by Foghorn Leghorn not realizing the part I put up to my ear is a stick of dynamite. Let me rush in where angels fear to tread.
Musical worship is to be God centered and not man centered. Man centering occurs in a number of different ways. When quality, emotion, sentiment, style, and several other human desires rise to a place of too high of importance we are off course. Even though it is God centered, it is meant to engage humanity in worshiping Him. Consequently, quality, sentiment, style, etc..... have a necessary place. Where are the lines? Who makes the call? Is God's desire for worship unknowable?
God's desire for musical worship specifics is unknowable to the extent we would like. If only Jesus would have walked around the Sea of Galilee humming the tunes that were His favorites. Scripture's silence on the subject is noteworthy. We are left to fearfully and creatively extract methods and specifics of worship within the context of a Spirit led community that works to discern the ethos of Scripture. This flies in the face of our desire to autonomously critique and decide on worship methods in the privacy of our own minds. We want to bypass communities and authorities God has placed in the church and become self made dictators of preferences based on our supposed mastery of absolutes.
Primarily we need to keep in mind that leadership is responsible and accountable for worship styles and offerings. The rest of us are responsible only for how we approach worship. This should relieve us of being perpetual critics. Unfortunately, we are too demanding and continue to step in the same puddle of making our preferences into absolutes. It is leadership's responsibility to wrestle appropriately with sentiment, emotion, stardom, quality, style, etc..... If we are invited into that process, we go with humility and deference. If we are not invited and it frustrates us, there is probably something beyond worship that we need to learn about our own hearts.
Leadership, on the other hand, is responsible for what is put forth artistically to lead the community in worship. They too must be humble and open, yet they must ultimately make decisions. They must work hard to guard against empty sentiment, man-centered emotionalism, and shoddy offerings that are passed off as "earthy". Things like timing, quality and and how to feature people in the process is also important. They will miss the mark at times, but so will I in my teaching and writing.
Some church's boast of their "superior" quality musicians. Others prefer using as many volunteers as possible. Some churches believe in quiet, reverent traditional hymns, while others say "holy" can be witnessed only where freedom reigns. Which is right? I am not sure. I would be very cautious to raise one above the other. Our leadership is responsible for our choices, and their leadership is responsible for their choices. For my part, I am responsible for neither.
I believe a big part of our problem is the amount of choice we expect from the marketplace. It is so much a part of our worldview that church becomes just another consumer interaction where I go to get what I want. Unfortunately, indulging my wants often precludes me from getting what I need.
Often we pontificate about "pure" and "authentic" worship while at the same time we treat our spouses/kids poorly, don't joyfully give our money to our church, don't pray, don't study Scripture, and on and on. It is as if 30 minutes of music is the sole expression of our spirituality. No wonder we're so demanding. That 30 minutes must undo the hypocrisy of the remainder of our week.
Additionally, we immerse ourselves in crappy TV/crappy movies/crappy romance novels/video games/facebook and more. We literally dumb down our thinking and then show up Sunday thinking the way we think is the way God thinks.
For the participant in musical worship - be still and know He is God and He has put leadership and community in place to bring praise to Himself.
For leaders - understand emotionalism, sentimentality, and shallowness so you may guard against them. Above all else, know the Biblical story intimately and live it, so your music will reflect it.

December 14th, 2010 - 15:49
I think I am right in line with Paul. Your Scripture talks of participation of all in the worship of God. Everyone brings something to the table. Which I agree with. However those verses sit in a broader context. One of the overall themes of the entire letter is about unity through order and proper recognition of authority. In fact, the impetus for Paul’s letter is the Corinthian churches rejection of Paul’s authority to give direction. I think the chasm you speak of between what I wrote and what Paul taught is an illusion caused by proof-texting out of context.
December 11th, 2010 - 11:50
Good article, well written,though I would question a major premise. You wrote;”primarily, we need to keep in mind that leadership is responsible for music styles and offerings. The rest of us are only responsible for how we approach worship.”
The apostle Paul says;”When you come together everyone has a hmn, or a word of instruction, a revelation, a tongue or an interpretation. All of these things must be done for the strengthening of the church.”[1 cor. 14;26,27]
Seems to be a real chasm between Pauls vision and yours.
October 24th, 2010 - 16:32
Good first volley. I appreciate it. Give me a little time to respond. I don’t disagree with most of it, so I want to respond well.
October 22nd, 2010 - 06:34
I am not sure if I am a Hatfield or a Mccoy, but here I go…”Therefore since we are receiving a kingdom that cannot be shaken, let us be thankful, and so worship God acceptably with reverence and awe, for our God is a consuming fire.” Hebrews 12: 28-29
Worship, public and private, is based on something other than culture or preference-it is based on the character of God. God, who is a consuming fire, desires to be worshipped with reverence and awe. He commands us to worship Him acceptably, which implies there is an unacceptable way to worship Him. When I enter the sanctuary/auditorium on Sunday morning to what I would describe as a religious variety show…is that what this verse is communicating? Is it possible we have turned our worship service into something that pleases us more than it pleases God? That is my fear.
October 20th, 2010 - 08:31
I would have been disappointed had you not chimed in. In fact I probably would have checked the obituaries.
I like open family discussions too as long as everyone plays nice. I’m sure the Hatfields and McCoys started out as a nice open family discussion.
Why don’t you begin with your biblical points on this page?
October 20th, 2010 - 08:24
It will always be a deep tension in cultures with as many choices and expectations of choice as ours. I had hoped my post would have been passed throughout Christendom and resolved the issue until the second coming. Alas, I think it will fall short.
October 20th, 2010 - 07:19
We like to refer to the “church family” from time to time. I would love to have an open family discussion, complete with Biblical support for our practices. What would leadership think of that?
October 17th, 2010 - 05:21
Dear Hound Dog:
Thanks for picking-up the phone. This is a balanced and fair treatment of all sides. Especially appreciate the clarity with the responsibilities of the participant and the responsibilities of church leadership and how each engages the tension. And, as always, you “bring it home” by exposing possible blind spots in our marriage, parenting and social activities. The issue isn’t always the issue, is it? I think this will continue to be a point of deep tension in the church because it is so important. And, it is ultimately about our hearts. Mine always needs work…
Well, gotta go and get ready for Sunday worship!